Peer Review
Peer Review Process
Hastagina: Jurnal Kriya dan Industri Kreatif is dedicated to ensuring the quality and integrity of scholarly content. All submitted manuscripts undergo a rigorous review process based on the Double-Blind Review model.
Double-Blind Review Model
This model ensures objectivity and minimizes potential bias by maintaining complete anonymity throughout the review cycle:
- • Reviewers' Anonymity: Reviewers are unaware of the authors' identity, institution, or background.
- • Authors' Anonymity: Authors are unaware of the reviewers' names or identities.
Duration & Ethical Commitment
Review Duration: The entire peer-review process typically takes 4 to 8 weeks, depending on manuscript complexity and reviewer responsiveness.
Stages of the Review Process
| Step | Responsible Party | Description |
|---|---|---|
| I. Initial Screening | Editor-in-Chief / Editorial Team | Assessed for journal scope compliance, author guidelines adherence, and plagiarism screening (max 20% similarity). Failed manuscripts are desk-rejected. |
| II. Assignment of Reviewers | Editor-in-Chief / Section Editor | Manuscript is anonymized and sent to at least two independent expert reviewers knowledgeable in the field. |
| III. Peer Review (Double-Blind) | Reviewers | Evaluates originality, methodological soundness, creative process, clarity, and theoretical contribution. Detailed feedback is submitted to editors. |
| IV. Editorial Decision | Editor-in-Chief / Section Editor | Decision is made: Accept Submission, Minor Revisions, Major Revisions, or Reject Submission. |
| V. Revision & Re-submission | Authors | Authors address comments point-by-point. Revised manuscripts may undergo a second review round if required. |
| VI. Final Acceptance | Editor-in-Chief | Once quality and ethical standards are met, the paper is formally accepted and moved to production. |
Hastagina: Jurnal Kriya dan Industri Kreatif maintains rigorous peer review standards to foster quality research in Craft and Creative Industries.