Peer Review Process
Peer Review Process & Editorial Workflow
Submission and Review System: Tattwaloka Journal operates an integrated online management system for all submissions and peer reviews. The Editorial Board holds full authority over paper selection and the appointment of qualified peer reviewers.
The journal upholds the highest standards of scientific integrity and objectivity by employing a double-blind peer review process. Identities of both authors and reviewers remain strictly anonymous throughout the process. Authors must remove all self-identifying information from the manuscript file prior to submission to eliminate bias and conflicts of interest.
Evaluation Criteria
Each manuscript is assessed by at least two independent expert reviewers based on:
- Originality & Novelty: Fresh theoretical or empirical contributions to design research.
- Methodological Rigour: Objectivity, sound execution, and scientific structure.
- Impact & Contribution: Relevance to academic discourse and industry practice.
- Clarity & References: Clear conclusions backed by high-quality literature citations.
Standard Timelines
The Editorial Board ensures strict confidentiality and adheres to an efficient review schedule:
Possible Editorial Decisions
Final decisions are communicated to the corresponding author based on peer reviewer recommendations:
Editorial and Publishing Process
