THE  EXPLOITATION OF POVERTY IN THE VIRTUAL ERA AS AN IDEA FOR CREATING PAINTINGS

Yusnita Maria Magdalena Gultom; I Dewa Putu Gede Budiarta; I Gede Yosef Tjokropramono

doi:10.59997/ctkr.v6i1.4463

THE EXPLOITATION OF POVERTY IN THE VIRTUAL ERA AS AN IDEA FOR CREATING PAINTINGS

Authors

Yusnita Maria Magdalena Gultom Institut Seni Indonesia Bali
I Dewa Putu Gede Budiarta Institut Seni Indonesia Bali
I Gede Yosef Tjokropramono Institut Seni Indonesia Bali

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59997/ctkr.v6i1.4463

Keywords:

exploitation, poverty, virtual, deformation, expressionist

Abstract

The exploitation of poverty that occurs in the virtual space of social media is an act of dehumanization of digital culture. The condition of the poor people who are less empowered is used as a weapon to gain wealth and popularity through various social media content. This painting is intended to describe the meaning, stages, and visual results with the theme of the phenomenon of poverty exploitation in the virtual era. The creator uses a creation method that broadly refers to the creation method discovered by Hawkins, consisting of three stages, namely exploration, improvisation, and forming. The characteristics of the six works created are seen in the use of thick textures, anatomically deformed objects, and colors that tend to be contrasting, unique, spontaneous, and simple in order to display an emotional and dynamic impression. The visualization of the work applies a variety of techniques, such as the wet-on-wet technique, the paint-melting technique, and the plaque technique. Through this work, it is hoped that all people, especially the lower middle class, will gain equality and be appreciated for their existence, both in social and cultural activities. In addition, the creator also persuasively invites the public to use social media wisely and creatively through the art of painting.

References

K. Sukardi, S. Tinggi, I. Ekonomi, and J. Bulan, “ANALISIS KEMISKINAN MULTIDIMENSI MASYARAKAT GORONG-GORONG KELURAHAN KEBUN SIRIH DI KABUPATEN MIMIKA"

N. Palikhah, F. Dakwah, D. Komunikasi, and I. Antasari, “Konsep Kemiskinan Kultural,” 2016.

“EXPLOITATION OF THE ELDERLY IN THE FORM OF ONLINE BEGGING THROUGH SOCIAL MEDIA TIKTOK EKSPLOITASI LANSIA DALAM BENTUK PENGEMISAN ONLINE MELALUI MEDIA SOSIAL TIKTOK Nursita Fierdiana Dwi Andariesta 1a (*) Astutik 2b Toetik Rahayuningsih 3c" doi: 10.36526/js.v3i2.

J. Firth et al., “The ‘online brain’: how the Internet may be changing our cognition,” World Psychiatry, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 119–129, Jun. 2019, doi: 10.1002/wps.20617.

J. Bias Cakrawala, A. Rahma Permatasari, W. O. Khoirunnisa, A. Kemal Elsyifa, M. Phitaloka, and F. Purwaningtyas, “Komodifikasi Empati: Eksplorasi Fenomena ‘Ngemis dan Nyawer’ Online di Media Sosial TikTok Empathy Commodification: The Exploration of Online ‘Ngemis Nyawer’ Phenomenon on TikTok,” Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan dan Teknologi Komunikasi, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 1–14, doi: 10.17933/iptekkom.26.1.2024.1-14.

T. N. Srinivasan, New Partnership for Africa’s Development. INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND, 2015. doi: 10.5089/9781589062627.072.

J. Ilmu, P. Nonformal, H. Shamsadeen, A. Z. Farhad, and S. Jameel, “AKSARA: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Nonformal 527 Exploiting The Reputation Of Influencers And Their Credibility To Their Followers In The Process Of Marketing Services Through Social Media,” vol. 10, no. 1, 2024, doi: 10.37905/aksara.10.1.527-542.2024.

J. Berger and K. L. Milkman, “Emotion and Virality: What Makes Online Content Go Viral?,” GfK Marketing Intelligence Review, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 18–23, May 2013, doi: 10.2478/gfkmir-2014-0022.

S. Azzahrani et al., “EKSPRESI EMOSI NEGATIF DALAM MEDIA SOSIAL (STUDI PADA KOMUNITAS ‘MARAH-MARAH’ DI TWITTER).”

A. Syukri, “Filsafat Ilmu dan Pengembangan Metode Ilmiah,” Jurnal Filsafat Indonesia, vol. 4, 2021.

A. Wahyudi and Z. Hendri, “Lukisan surealis seni Angguk: sebuah penelitian berbasis penciptaan seni,” vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 159–174, doi: 10.21831/su.

Ni and N. Seriati, “KENDALA PENCIPTAAN KARYA TARI OLEH MAHASISWA.”

Wiradana Made, “Metode Penciptaan,” Denpasar, Apr. 2024.

H. Yatim and S. Saenal, “PROSES PENCIPTAAN TARI DALAM PEMBELAJARAN SENI BUDAYA PADA SISWA KELAS XII DI UPT SMA NEGERI 3 TAKALAR.”

N.-N. Budaya et al., “NILAI-NILAI BUDAYA RONGGOSUKOWATI SEBAGAI SUMBER PENCIPTAAN KARYA SENI LUKIS.”

WIRADANA M, “METODE IMPROFISASI,” DENPASAR, Apr. 2024.

I. Gede, J. Putra, and W. Gede Budayana, “PASCA IMAJINER DALAM RUANG LINGKUP PENCIPTAAN SENI."

P.Dyah and W. Puspitasari, “TEORI PSIKOANALISIS FREUD.”

A. Bernes Aginza, M. Sattar Program Studi Pendidikan Seni Rupa, F. Bahasa dan Seni, and U. Negeri Surabaya, “PERMAINAN MASA KECIL SEBAGAI INSPIRASI PENCIPTAAN KARYA SENI LUKIS,” 2016.

K. Bharadwaj, “FUNDAMENTALS OF ART WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO LINE AND SHAPE,” ShodhKosh: Journal of Visual and Performing Arts, vol. 2, no. 1SE, pp. 16–20, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.29121/shodhkosh.v2.i1SE.2021.16.

Swastika, A. Nugraha, P. S. Rupa, F. Bahasa, D. Seni, and U. N. Yogyakarta, “IKAN MAS KOKI SEBAGAI IDE DASAR PENCIPTAAN SENI KRIYA LOGAM: GOLDENFISH AS BASIC IDEAS OF METAL CRAFT ARTWORK CREATION.”

Y. A. de Vries, M. ten Have, R. de Graaf, S. van Dorsselaer, N. M. P. de Ruiter, and P. de Jonge, “The relationship between mental disorders and actual and desired subjective social status,” Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci, vol. 29, p. e83, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1017/S2045796019000805.

SEKAR GANDHAWANGI, “Elderly Exploitation Prohibited,” Jakarta, 2023.

F. Arina Suhendar, R. Vita Sari, T. Pangesti, Z. Muflih Gusma Putra, and A. Prio Agus Santoso, “The Impact of Poverty in Indonesia on Education,” Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan (JISIP), vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 2598–9944, 2024, doi: 10.58258/jisip.v7i1.6682/http.

S. S. Syaharani, M. Amirulloh, and S. Somawijaya, “TIKTOK DAN WAJAH KEMISKINAN: TINJAUAN HUKUM SIBER INDONESIA TERHADAP EKSPLOITASI ONLINE,” Acta Diurnal Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kenotariatan dan ke-PPAT-an, vol. 7, no. 1, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.23920/acta.v7i1.1698.